For those of you who weren’t aware…..World Trade Center 7 was the 3rd (yes third) building to collapse in New York City on September 11th, 2001.

The only steel framed high rise building to ever collapse due to fire (other than WTC’s 1 and 2 of course…)  before or since that day was not struck by an aircraft as the other towers.

This 47 story tall building was ostensibly lit ablaze by debris falling from the other site, melted the structural steel holding it all together and collapsed at free-fall speed  perfectly into it’s own footprint.

The fact that the BBC and CNN both reported the event before it happened, or that many people were recorded saying they had foreknowledge of a collapse just reenforces the validity of this article in my mind.

There have been many obvious questions surrounding the governments official account of what happened that day, and the lie seems to have unraveled further.

The latest research establishes that World Trade Center Building 7 was destroyed by controlled demolition.

The 24-member 9/11 Consensus Panel – which includes physicists, chemists, engineers, commercial pilots, attorneys and lawyers – today announced three new studies confirming the controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7.

The studies scientifically refute the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) claim that, for the first time in history, fire caused the sudden and complete collapse of a large, fire-protected, steel-framed building on 9/11.

(Note that whereas the Consensus Panel uses a scientific methodology to peer-review its work, the NIST report was not peer-reviewed.)

My question is simply this. If people blew up WTC7 on that day and hidden the truth for 13 years, why could they have not blown up the other two as well?

If you don’t first question your preconceived notions, how will you ever be able to objectively observe the truth?

Please bother to read Sleuth Journals’ full article here.